No Contract Cell - NBC4 Washington

Liz Crenshaw's Guide to Consumer Issues, Recalls and More

No Contract Cell

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    No Contract Cell

    Liz Crenshaw and Consumers Union discuss the pros and cons of no-contract phone options. (Published Monday, March 24, 2014)

    If you have a two-year contract on your cell phone, you're probably dishing out more than a hundred dollars a month for service.

    Now, Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports magazine, has us looking at no-contract cell phone options in a new way. If you’re considering making the switch, here are some things to consider:

    • PRO TO SWITCHING: No more termination fees. Since you’re not in a contract, there shouldn’t be a fee if you try to get a new phone or move to another service. Also, if you’re stuck in a two-year contract,some carriers like T-Mobile say they’ll pay early termination fees, up to $350 per line.
    • CON TO SWITCHING: You might have to pay full price for a new smartphone. For example, a 16-gig iPhone 5S will set you back $649. Most contract carriers subsidize the cost of new phones. For some consumers, that alone is reason to stick to a contract plan, according to Consumers Union.
    • PRO TO SWITCHING: You could save more money over time. Consumer Reports tracked the cost of 4 different wireless carriers over the course of two years. While the two no-contract carriers, Straight Talk and Cricket, charged hundreds of dollars more up front for the phone, after two years they cost about $1,000 less than contract phone plans from Verizon and AT&T.
    • (POTENTIAL) CON TO SWITCHING: Quality of coverage and service. Some no-contract companies buy space on the same networks as the biggest wireless providers. Yet, some base coverage on the type of phone you have.

    BOTTOM LINE: There’s no guarantee you’ll save money unless you sit down and crunch numbers for your individual needs when it comes to a cell phone carrier.