- A district court judge in Washington, D.C., said Tuesday that Elon Musk has an expansive role in the federal government.
- Judge Tanya Chutkan is presiding over a case brought by 14 states against Musk and President Trump.
- The plaintiffs are arguing that Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency violated the Constitution.
In its bid to have a lawsuit against Elon Musk, the Department of Government Efficiency and President Donald Trump dismissed, the White House had "unsuccessfully" tried to define Musk's role in the federal government as temporary, a district court judge in Washington, D.C., said in an order out Tuesday.
Stream NBC4 newscasts for free right here, right now.
WATCH HEREA group of 14 states, led by New Mexico, had sued Musk, DOGE and Trump in February for allegedly violating the Constitution. The states' attorneys general argued that Musk lacked the legal authority to make sweeping cuts and other changes to the federal government because he is not a Senate-confirmed officer of the government, and DOGE was never authorized by Congress.
Attorneys for the White House, in a motion they filed hoping to have the case dismissed, characterized Musk as holding an advisory and temporary job in the Trump administration only.
We have the news you need to know to start your day. Sign up for the First & 4Most morning newsletter — delivered to your inbox daily.
SIGN UP The judge in the federal court, Tanya Chutkan, found that Musk's reach extends throughout the executive branch without any known limits, even though the White House had tried to "minimize Musk's role, framing him as a mere advisor without any formal authority."
Chutkan wrote that the 14 states made a credible argument that the tech billionaire and Trump megadonor now "occupies a continuing position" and "exercises significant authority," all without "proper appointment" by Congress.
She also wrote that the states' allegations that DOGE had gained "unauthorized access" to "private and proprietary information" were "sufficient to allege an injury," and that the case can move forward.
Money Report
Citing his mission as one of fiscal discipline, Musk has led the DOGE effort to eliminate certain federal offices, slash regulations and rapidly cut down the federal workforce, while reprogramming or removing some government websites, software and systems.
Chutkan decided that Trump could be dismissed as a defendant in the case, writing on Tuesday that the court "may not enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties." The president does have "highly discretionary" power, she wrote, to select and nominate officers under the appointments clause of the U.S. Constitution.
