Skins Trademark Battle Goes to Supreme Court

Group claims Redskins is derogatory

By JIM IOVINO
Updated 11:18 AM EST, Tue, Sep 15, 2009

TWITTER FACEBOOK

Getty Images

The battle of the Washington Redskins' team name has reached the U.S. Supreme Court, but don't worry, you probably won't have to tape over the Redskins' logo on your favorite jersey anytime soon.

Lawyers for a group of Native Americans filed a petition for certiorari in the case that has bounced around courtrooms for years, according to Legal Times. The Native American group claims that the name "Redskins" is a derogatory term for Indians. They want the Redskins trademark, which was issued in 1967, canceled.

The latest ruling on the case by the U.S. Court of Appeals said the claims weren't allowed because the group didn't file in a timely manner, not because any court agrees or disagrees that the trademark is offensive or racist. So now the group's lawyers are asking the Supreme Court to review that decision.

What's In Antwaan's Locker?

What's In Antwaan's Locker?
WATCH

What's In Antwaan's Locker?

But (the group's lawyers) asserted that the doctrine does not apply, because the law explicitly allows cancellations of trademarks "at any time." He cites a 2001 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit in Marshak v. Treadwell, in which now-Justice Samuel Alito Jr. said trademark cancellation claims are not time-barred. "We hope that ruling will be of some help," said Mause.

What does the trademark battle mean for the Redskins? The Washington Post summed it up after the latest court ruling in May:

Attorneys for the National Football League franchise say the name is a sign of honor but are also fighting to protect millions of dollars' worth of sales of Redskins merchandise. If the team had lost in court, it could have continued to use the name on Redskins paraphernalia but would have faced a tougher time preventing merchants from infringing on its trademarks.

What does this all mean for Redskins fans? Not much at the moment. The group's lawyers said the Supreme Court probably won't take up the petition before the end of the year.

So, Chief Zee is free to scalp as many Cowboys as he wants -- for now.

First Published: Sep 15, 2009 6:58 AM EST

TWITTER FACEBOOK

  • 39% bored 114
  • 23% furious 68
  • 14% laughing 42
  • 9% thrilled 25
  • 8% intrigued 23
  • 7% sad 21
processing
          No comments have been posted yet.

          You have 2000 characters left

          processing
          So My City

          You are posting in (change)

          550/550 characters

          (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)

          (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)
          *Tip: You can also post moments via email or Twitter.

          processing

          View Your Moment in

          Posted by | 1 second ago

          Don't Miss

          local_beat

          5 hours ago

          Jogger Assault Suspect May Live in the Neighborhood

          Takoma Park neighbors are on edge after Thursday's attack.

          Read It

          local_beat

          5 hours ago

          Fenty’s 39th Birthday Bash All Set

          The party's happening at the Old Mayoral Mansion site.

          Read It

          local_beat

          Nov 20, 2009

          In Mary She Trusts

          Woman leaves her life savings in the care of the Virgin Mary.

          Read It
          Loading...
          Birthdate:
          You must be at least 13 to sign up.
          Gender:
          invalid

          By clicking the button below, I accept the terms of use and privacy policy

          Already Signed Up? Login Below.

          processing
          Here's what we're posting:

          *Only used for verification. We do not store your password.
          processing