NBC Washington /

News

Norton: D.C. Voting Rights 'Inevitable' by Next Year Obama, Biden supported last bill

By  JIM IOVINO

Updated 8:10 AM EDT, Fri, Nov 14, 2008

Getty Images

WASHINGTON: Former actress Faith Dane blows a trumpet during a rally to ask for voting representation for the nation's capital in the U.S. House of Representatives on April 16, 2007.

 

With Barack Obama heading to the White House, D.C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton feels good about her chances of finally winning the fight to get voting rights for the District.

"The election has made it all but inevitable," Norton told the Washington Times.

After all these years, why is Norton so sure now?

Norton estimated that 65 senators favor the idea of giving voting rights to D.C., which she will ask for in her Voting Rights Act of 2009, the Times reported. 

"I will seek the earliest vote in both the House and Senate," Norton said the day after Obama won the election. "The vote for D.C. residents should have been granted 209 years ago as the framers of the Constitution intended. Two centuries of waiting has been disgraceful.  We must insist on no more delay, particularly now that we have the votes."

Norton's attempt last year failed.  The bill passed the House, but failed to get the 60 votes needed in the Senate.

By her estimates, new Democratic senators elected to replace Republicans could push the bill through.  And once it does, she has a friend in the White House to sign off on it.

Both Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden supported the last voting rights bill. 

And that's not all.

Norton told the Times that Obama personally told her he would sign a voting rights bill if it reached his desk.

Comments (22)

Sort by: Most Recent | Oldest
  • Hello!! Sunday, Nov 16 at 8:25 PM FLAG COMMENT To katgirl: Hmmmmmmmmmm... How about tourism for starters. Many states have that as the main basis for their economy. To: Rudy: If the capitol of the US were in Idaho it would be the same. Everyone in the country would still have to pitch in to pay for what having the government costs. Upkeep of the buildings, security, etc. DC residents don't get money that the "states" themselves don't receive as subsidies for s ... MORE >
  • Anonymous Sunday, Nov 16 at 8:52 AM FLAG COMMENT Ignorant and clueless. These people are mentally defectives in thie logic.were loking at bringing African politics to the National level. I think we just elected Mugabe.
  • katgirl Sunday, Nov 16 at 8:22 AM FLAG COMMENT how could DC be a state? what business do they run to bring in an economy?
  • Rudy Saturday, Nov 15 at 8:21 AM FLAG COMMENT DC is not a State, its a Federal city. DC has already sucked every dollar they could from the Feds, now they want the commuter tax for more freebees. DC government is the most corrupt, worst run, good old boys system ever. Now obama wants to spread the wealth
  • PB Saturday, Nov 15 at 12:32 AM FLAG COMMENT If DC cannot be a "state" and federal income taxes are collected from "states" doesn't that mean we should get all the federal taxes that we have paid in back? Or at least be exempt in the future? I'll take that trade..... BTW, how exactly would having a vote give DC unfair political advantage? We'd have about as much pull as RI.

Post a Comment

Name


Comment - You have 2000 characters left

Enter both words below, separated by a space, in the field located to the lower right. Can't read the words below? Try different words or an audio captcha. What's this?