Local Governments Want to Tax You Per Mile

$400,000 doesn't buy what it used to

By CHRIS NEEDHAM
Updated 7:42 PM EDT, Thu, Oct 22, 2009

TWITTER FACEBOOK

If yesterday's vote is any indication, the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments has far too much time and money on its hands.

The Council's transportation subgroup decided that a $400,000 study into the possibility of taxing motorists based on the miles they drive is a priority.

To be fair, the Council is only putting up $80,000 of the study's funding.  The rest is coming from the federal government, so taxpayers won't be affected.  Wait, what?

Who among us wouldn't want to pay tolls on all non-tolled roads?  Wouldn't the commute into D.C. or to Tysons Corner be all the more fun if you were being charged for every stinking mile of stalled traffic?

DC Considers Charging Drivers by the Mile

DC Considers Charging Drivers by the Mile
WATCH

DC Considers Charging Drivers by the Mile

COG Rep Explains Commuter Fee Idea

COG Rep Explains Commuter Fee Idea
WATCH

COG Rep Explains Commuter Fee Idea

Ron Kirby, director of the Council's transportation planning board, told the Washington Business Journal that taxing commuters by distance is a brilliant idea:

"The study will look at the public acceptability issues of the concept. It's a great idea in theory and the technology for it is available, but getting people to do it is the challenge. Some people resist the idea of tolls on roads that don't currently have them, but it may be time for something drastic."

Do they really need $400,000 to tell them that the public is going to hate the idea of paying tolls?  That's what passes for good government around here?

It might make sense in some wonky academic setting, but Lon Anderson, a spokesman for AAA told the Post that its net effect would be to increase the gas tax to $2-3 per gallon.

Kirby also tells the Post that the study is going to look at how an increase in taxes would affect people of different income levels.  Hmm... another imponderable.  What are the chances it shows that the less money you have, the more you'll be affected?

Apparently if you want a survey with non-obvious questions and answers, you need to pay more than $400,000.

First Published: Oct 22, 2009 9:52 AM EDT

TWITTER FACEBOOK

  • 89% furious 119
  • 5% thrilled 7
  • 4% laughing 5
  • 1% sad 1
  • 1% bored 1
  • 0% intrigued 0
processing
      No comments have been posted yet.

      You have 2000 characters left

      processing
      So My City

      You are posting in (change)

      550/550 characters

      (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)

      (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)
      *Tip: You can also post moments via email or Twitter.

      processing

      View Your Moment in

      Posted by | 1 second ago

      Don't Miss

      local_beat

      Mar 19, 2010

      Next Stop: Unemployment

      A Metrobus driver exposed for texting on the job on a local blog is fired.

      Read It

      local_beat

      Mar 19, 2010

      Fatal Beating in Fairfax County

      The victim of an apparent beating in Fairfax County died Friday.

      Read It

      local_beat

      Mar 19, 2010

      "I Was Just Holding on for Dear Life"

      Police save a man trying to jump off an overpass in Gaithersburg.

      Read It
      Loading...
      Birthdate:
      You must be at least 13 to sign up.
      Gender:
      invalid

      By clicking the button below, I accept the terms of use and privacy policy

      Already Signed Up? Login Below.

      processing

      Here's what we're posting:

      *Only used for verification. We do not store your password.
      processing